🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 956+ reviews
Beautyβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(956 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

fresh, in damaged box. Retails for $18

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express delivery
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold

brand-new, in damaged box. Retails for $18

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 153521

Category: Beauty > Tools & Accessories > Tweezers

Original Price:$10 USD

Sale Price:$6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9385 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredible quality
The Tweezerman, iconic Lash Curler, Rosegold is usable.
36 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Diego, CA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superior
This Tweezerman, iconic Lash Curler, Rosegold is worth buying.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
I wouldn’t say it’s excellent, but the Tweezerman, enduring Lash Curler, Rosegold is reliable.
19 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
merely what I wanted
To be fair, the Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold performs as expected and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
39 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely superb
So far, the Tweezerman, timeless Lash Curler, Rosegold is simple to use which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful