🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 244+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage porcelain pitcher

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(244 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11.73
$19.55
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage porcelain pitcher will ship with care priced to sell

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage porcelain pitcher

Vintage porcelain pitcher will ship with care priced to sell​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 271409

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Pitchers

Original Price:$19.55 USD

Sale Price:$11.73 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9286 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
The Vintage porcelain pitcher was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.
50 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
outstanding
For the price, it is practical and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
39 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
definitely impressed
Personally, the Vintage porcelain pitcher performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Works fine so far.
45 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
At first, it is practical and I’m satisfied.
14 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly satisfied
The Vintage porcelain pitcher works fine for right now.
19 people found this helpful