🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 673+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(673 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

4 inches, assorted wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

4 inches, several wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 308443

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Cameras

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2924 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
I tried the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera and it works as described.
26 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Louisville, KY​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy it!
From my experience, the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera feels okay which is good enough. No setup issues.
44 people found this helpful
JM​
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy it!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality matches its price.
3 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 days ago Β· Albuquerque, NM

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality is nothing unexpected.
43 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy love love!
So far, it is accessible to use so it’s acceptable.
50 people found this helpful