🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 885+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(885 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6.67​
$11.12
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5

VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 689332

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price:$11.12 USD

Sale Price:$6.67 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3970 reviews

MR
Mike Reynolds
4 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ideal for my needs
After assorted use, the VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5 works fine so it’s acceptable.
46 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Austin, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, the VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5 works fine and it works for me. Packaging was uncomplicated.
23 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
adore love love!
At first, it feels solid enough and I don’t regret it.
31 people found this helpful​
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
faultless in every way
Honestly, the VTG Sterling Silver Ring sz 6,5 performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
49 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality
To be fair, it performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
48 people found this helpful