🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 859+ reviews
Kidsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Livis & Luca Ruche retro Mary Jane

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(859 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

GUC. Shows certain wear, as seen in photos. Toddler Size 8.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Livis & Luca Ruche vintage Mary Jane

GUC. Shows certain wear, as seen in photos.
Toddler Size 8.​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1295072

Category: Kids > Girls Shoes > Girls 2T-5T

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price:$15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3102 reviews

JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply astonishing
So far, the Livis & Luca Ruche iconic Mary Jane is straightforward to use and I’m satisfied.
11 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure it!
it does the job and I’m satisfied. fulfillment was normal.
10 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark
1 day ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
highly satisfied
Personally, the Livis & Luca Ruche iconic Mary Jane fits my needs which feels reasonable. distribution was normal.
1 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Totally worth it
Good value item Livis & Luca Ruche traditional Mary Jane.
15 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
For the price, the Livis & Luca Ruche retro Mary Jane performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
31 people found this helpful