🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 110+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

We the on the house paper bag shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(110 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18
$30
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

not once worn paper bag shorts from gratis People. Size XS. Cream color.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

We the on the house paper bag shorts

not once worn paper bag shorts from complimentary People. Size XS. Cream color.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1349552

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$30 USD

Sale Price:$18 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8121 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
Overall incredibly happy with this We the gratis paper bag shorts.
14 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
Personally, it works as described so no complaints.
15 people found this helpful
SA​
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premium
So far, it feels okay and it meets expectations.
43 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
To be fair, the We the gratis paper bag shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable.
27 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
premier decision
After a few days, the We the gratis paper bag shorts is practical so it’s acceptable.
19 people found this helpful