🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 189+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

PINK Pajama Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(189 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8.21
$13.68
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Worn but fancy just-arrived, looks like a different color in the pictures, but they are mint

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

PINK Pajama Shorts

Worn but fancy just-arrived, looks like a different color in the pictures, but they are mint

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1420882

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Coasters

Original Price:$13.68 USD

Sale Price:$8.21 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8813 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid value for money
To be fair, the PINK Pajama Shorts is practical so no complaints.
38 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous PINK Pajama Shorts!
Quality feels fine for the price.
35 people found this helpful
MW​
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
The PINK Pajama Shorts is uncomplicated to operate.
36 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb PINK Pajama Shorts
Personally, the PINK Pajama Shorts works fine and it meets expectations. fulfillment was normal.
32 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
11 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
At first, the PINK Pajama Shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable.
13 people found this helpful