🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 961+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Jumper - tiger

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(961 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$137
$228.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Neckline : BacklessPattern : Animal printArticle number : VEI21I01L-H11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Jumper - tiger

Neckline : Backless
Pattern : Animal print
Article number : VEI21I01L-H11​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1603646

Category: Women > Clothing > Knitwear & Cardigans

Original Price:$228.33 USD

Sale Price:$137 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3188 reviews

EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
After a few days, the Jumper - tiger feels okay so I’m okay with it.
21 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
treasure love love!
I bought the Jumper - tiger after reading reviews. No regrets so far.
46 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent choice
In daily use, the Jumper - tiger works as described and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
49 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So happy with this
This is my third Jumper - tiger purchase. Consistently fine every time.
46 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
actually impressed
After a few use, the Jumper - tiger works well enough and it’s fine overall.
36 people found this helpful