๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 774+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.4 out of 5(774 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.8
$21.33
Sale
โœ“ complimentary distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Mismatched shoes

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
easy-to-use Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's

Mismatched shoes

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2215837

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Shoes

Original Price:$21.33 USD

Sale Price:$12.8 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1294 reviews

TM
Tyler Mitchell โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Fort Worth, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
splendid value for money
First time buying Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's here, truly satisfied with the service.
31 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
1 day ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
Personally, the Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's does its job so no complaints.
44 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Impressed!
remarkably good value Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's.
2 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy this Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's!
To be fair, the Unmatched Vintage Barbie Shoe Lot 1970's works as described so no complaints. Nothing fancy.
32 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท San Antonio, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly satisfied
Works fine for me.
11 people found this helpful